zaccasacca

Electronic Arts on Friday won the dismissal of one lawsuit against it regarding its use of identifying characteristics of real college football players in its NCAA Football series. A federal judge said EA’s [[link]] right to free expression under the First Amendment supersedes a former quarterback’s right to control the use of his likeness.(new Image()).src = 'https://capi.connatix.com/tr/si?token=995c4c7d-194f-4077-b0a0-7ad466eb737c&cid=872d12ce-453b-4870-845f-955919887e1b'; cnx.cmd.push(function() { cnx({ playerId: "995c4c7d-194f-4077-b0a0-7ad466eb737c" }).render("79703296e5134c75a2db6e1b64762017"); }); The dismissal was at the federal district court level; it’s unknown if the player in question, former Rutgers quarterback Ryan Hart, intends to appeal or on what grounds he would do so. EA prevailed under a similar argument in 2009 against football hall-of-famer Jim Brown https://kotaku.com/federal-judge-rules-video-games-are-protected-expressi-5369702 Litigation concerning other players whose likenesses were used in EA Sports titles still is pending, though Friday’s decision may affect that. In NCAA Football current players are often identified by every characteristic other than their real name, including their ethnicity, height, weight, [[link]] uniform number, equipment, playing position and how well they are rated at that position. Hart hard argued that depiction, even without [[link]] the name, was enough to identify him. But Judge Freda Wolfson, a federal judge in New Jersey, ruled that EA’s right to produce works of creative expression protected by the First Amendment, which the Supreme Court recently found video games to be, trumped Hart’s right to privacy and control of his likeness. https://kotaku.com/first-amendment-trumps-california-in-supreme-court-batt-453102670 EA Wins Dismissal In NCAA Player Likeness Suit [Gamasutra] You can contact Owen Good, the author of this post, at [email protected]. You can also find him on Twitter, Facebook, and lurking around our #tips page.